Squeee!

July 31st, 2010
photo credit: Nick Rosza

photo credit: Nick Rosza

Today, I received an innocuous email entitled “workshop packet” from the Bread Loaf Writers’ Conference. The email started with the line, “Recently we sent a letter by regular mail to let you know which workshop you would be in this summer. I hope you have it in hand now, but there’s a chance you’re receiving this email before the letter….” Unfortunately, in Alaska, mail can sometimes be a “little” slow. So, I scrolled down the see if the name of my workshop leader was in the email. Nope.

It was however on the attached workshop packet. My packet was entitled Hirshfield_workshop packet poetry. Yay! I adore Jane Hirshfield. Seriously, she represents what I hope to be some day – a poet that speaks to people’s hearts while remaining true to her own vision of what her life should be. A member of the first graduating class of Princeton to contain women, Jane then took eight years away from publishing poetry to study at the San Francisco Zen Center. The Poetry Foundation quotes her, “I felt that I’d never make much of a poet if I didn’t know more than I knew at that time about what it means to be a human being. I don’t think poetry is based just on poetry; it is based on a thoroughly lived life. And so I couldn’t just decide I was going to write no matter what; I first had to find out what it means to live.

I pulled out her books to try to decide what to read and take with me this week when I head out to the east coast. My husband laughed at the sheer number of post-it notes fringing the pages of Jane’s poetry collection After and her essay collection Nine Gates: Entering the Mind of Poetry. I hadn’t even started stacking up the other books of hers that I’ve read and re-read over the past ten years. Hirshfield was one of the poets that I studied for my critical thesis for grad school.

So, I’m pretty danged excited. Can you tell?

Here’s a poem by Jane Hirshfield from After:

To Judgment: An Assay

You change a life
as eating an artichoke changes the taste
of whatever is eaten after.
Yet you are not an artichoke, not a piano or cat—
not objectively present at all—
and what of you a cat possesses is essential but narrow:
to know if the distance between two things can be leapt.
The piano, that good servant,
has none of you in her at all, she lends herself
to what asks; this has been my ambition as well.
Yet a person who has you is like an iron spigot
whose water comes from far-off mountain springs.
Inexhaustible, your confident pronouncements flow,
coldly delicious.
For if judgment hurts the teeth, it doesn’t mind,
not judgment. Teeth pass. Pain passes.
Judgment decrees what remains—
the serene judgments of evolution or the judgment
of a boy-king entering Persia: “Burn it,” he says,
and it burns. And if a small tear swells the corner
of one eye, it is only the smoke, it is no more to him than a beetle
fleeing the flames of the village with her six-legged children.
The biologist Haldane—in one of his tenderer moments—
judged beetles especially loved by God,
“because He had made so many.” For judgment can be tender:
I have seen you carry a fate to its end as softly as a retriever
carries the quail. Yet however much
I admire you at such moments, I cannot love you:
you are too much in me, weighing without pity your own worth.
When I have erased you from me entirely,
disrobed of your measuring adjectives,
stripped from my shoulders and hips each of your nouns,
when the world is horsefly, coal barge, and dawn the color of winter butter—
not beautiful, not cold, only the color of butter—
then perhaps I will love you. Helpless to not.
As a newborn wolf is helpless: no choice but hunt the wolf milk,
find it sweet.

  • Share/Bookmark

Happy Birthday Gerard!

July 28th, 2010

kingfisher-hunting-photos002When I was in high school, it was difficult to get books of contemporary poetry. I didn’t live in a big city. I didn’t live near a bookstore except for the one in the mall. The library didn’t really have a fabulous contemporary poetry section. And honestly, I don’t think that any of my teachers owned a book of poetry that they might share with me.

So, I was a young poet steeped in the classics, mostly poetry written by dead white guys who were born before 1930, oftentimes considerably before 1930. I don’t think this hurt me, much, but I sure did put a lot of mileage on the two volume anthology of poetry that my parents owned (and now sits on my shelf). I’ve admitted my great love for Yeats that grew from that collection, but not my secret love for Gerard Manley Hopkins.

My adoration for Hopkins was covert. It was a little freaky that I so loved this Jesuit priest’s work. He was melancholy, his verse irregular, and his subject matter consistently religious. It was his attraction to nature that really hooked me and that sprung rhythm. His word choices were so innovative and odd compared to the other poems that surrounded him in the anthology.

It wasn’t until I got to college and learned a lot more about him that my affinity for his work became clearer. (If you want to read a really in depth study of his life and work, The American Academy of Poets has one here that is just superb.) But even now, when I’ve a bookshelf of contemporary poets to read, I often find myself going back to luxuriate in Hopkins work. I will include a few below so you, too, can appreciate his beautiful use of the language.

As Kingfishers Catch Fire

As kingfishers catch fire, dragonflies dráw fláme;
As tumbled over rim in roundy wells
Stones ring; like each tucked string tells, each hung bell's
Bow swung finds tongue to fling out broad its name;
Each mortal thing does one thing and the same:
Deals out that being indoors each one dwells;
Selves—goes itself; myself it speaks and spells,
Crying Whát I do is me: for that I came.	

Í say móre: the just man justices;
Kéeps gráce: thát keeps all his goings graces;
Acts in God's eye what in God’s eye he is—
Chríst—for Christ plays in ten thousand places,
Lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his
To the Father through the features of men’s faces.

Pied Beauty

Glory be to God for dappled things--
   For skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow;
       For rose-moles all in stipple upon trout that swim;
Fresh-firecoal chestnut-falls; finches' wings;
   Landscape plotted and pieced--fold, fallow, and plough;
       And all trades, their gear and tackle and trim.

All things counter, original, spare, strange;
   Whatever is fickle, freckled (who knows how?)
      With swift, slow; sweet, sour; adazzle, dim;
He fathers-forth whose beauty is past change:
                                     Praise Him.
...

The Windhover

Caught this morning morning's minion, king-
  dom of daylight's dauphin, dapple-dawn-drawn Falcon, in his riding
  Of the rolling level underneath him steady air, and striding
High there, how he rung upon the rein of a wimpling wing
In his ecstasy! then off, off forth on swing,
  As a skate's heel sweeps smooth on a bow-bend: the hurl and gliding
  Rebuffed the big wind. My heart in hiding
Stirred for a bird,—the achieve of; the mastery of the thing!  

Brute beauty and valour and act, oh, air, pride, plume, here
  Buckle! AND the fire that breaks from thee then, a billion
Times told lovelier, more dangerous, O my chevalier!  

  No wonder of it: shéer plód makes plough down sillion
Shine, and blue-bleak embers, ah my dear,
  Fall, gall themselves, and gash gold-vermillion.

And if you haven’t gotten enough, check this out.

  • Share/Bookmark

Confesssion Tuesday – rejection edition

July 27th, 2010

rejectedI confess that I may appear  whiny making this confession – I’m feeling a little beat-up by rejection lately. Earlier this week I received a rejection within 48 hours of submitting a set of poems electronically. The editor said, “I enjoyed reading your poems but I’m unable to use them in the fall issue.” That sounds nice, and I truly believe that editors of literary magazines are hard-working and kind folks who want to help writers. Still, I had to wonder, did he really enjoy reading them? It’s possible that his periodical has such a back-log of work that they are rejecting everything until further notice – that would have been a good piece of information for me. Instead, it felt (please notice that verb, I am not saying this is the actual truth of the situation) that my work wasn’t even good enough to go into a slush pile for a few days.

I’ve had my share of wonderful acceptances to fabulous literary magazines that I have felt privileged to be a part of. Yet lately, I’ve been riding the rejection whirlwind. When those rejections come in spates, it’s hard to keep your game-face screwed on tightly. Of course it doesn’t help that it’s been raining for an entire month!

I know that my time to be published will come again. I do have faith in my work and the amount of effort that I put into developing my craft. In fact, this summer, I’ve read more, written more, and revised more than any other time in my life. I’ve taken my writing seriously. I will reap untold benefits from this. It just wasn’t this past week.

If anyone out there has any good strategies for soothing my slightly battered poetry ego, I’ll take them. I’ve been avoiding eating a pan of brownies or buying a new wardrobe to make myself feel better. What do the rest of you do when those rejection letters pile up?

And to make myself feel better, here are some rejections of famous literary works:

Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D. H. Lawrence

“For your own sake do not publish this book.”

The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame

“An irresponsible holiday story.”

Lord of the Flies by William Golding

“An absurd and uninteresting fantasy which was rubbish and dull.”

Carrie by Stephen King

“We are not interested in science fiction which deals with negative utopias.  They do not sell.”

Animal Farm by George Orwell

“It is impossible to sell animal stories in the USA.”

Watership Down by Richard Adams

“Older children wouldn’t like it because its language was too difficult.”

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

“… overwhelmingly nauseating, even to an enlightened Freudian … the whole thing is an unsure cross between hideous reality and improbable fantasy.  It often becomes a wild neurotic daydream … I recommend that it be buried under a stone for a thousand years.’

  • Share/Bookmark

Enjoy this – Jane Hirshfield

July 23rd, 2010

salmonberry

Sun today, in spates. The kind of sun that reminds you that soon it will be rain. The sky blue above you but darkening clouds at every horizon. Sometimes when I go for a walk, I carry a poem with me. I listen to it over and over as I walk. Today I thought of the poem “Perishable, It Said” by Jane Hirshfield. Perfect for a day like today.

Walking today in the sun, I was acutely aware of the vivid color after so many gray days. The salmon berries were ripe all along the way. Bear sign full of salmonberry leavings. Fireweed now blossoming at the bottom but inevitably the blossom will rise to the top and then be smoke. I was so thankful for the light. Thankful for time in the sun to consider the work of Jane Hirshfield, one of the faculty members at Bread Loaf next month. A long-term poet crush of mine. What is it called when you have a poet crush for years? A gift to find someone who speaks to your heart.

Perishable, It Said
by Jane Hirshfield

Perishable, it said on the plastic container,
and below, in different ink,
the date to be used by, the last teaspoon consumed.

I found myself looking:
now at the back of each hand,
now inside the knees,
now turning over each foot to look at the sole.

Then at the leaves of the young tomato plants,
then at the arguing jays.
Under the wooden table and lifted stones, looking.
Coffee cups, olives, cheeses,
hunger, sorrow, fears—
these too would certainly vanish, without knowing when.

How suddenly then
the strange happiness took me,
like a man with strong hands and strong mouth,
inside that hour with its perishing perfumes and clashings.

Source: Poetry (July/August 2009).

  • Share/Bookmark

Confession Tuesday – soggy version

July 20th, 2010

rain-1This has been a particularly rain summer so far. At this point, we’ve had twenty-six straight days that have been overcast or raining for the majority of the day. So, I’d like to confess that I’m sick of it. Yes, I’ve spent a lot of time reading, weaving, and writing. Yes, these are some of my favorite activities. But, well, I’d like to spend a little time outside as well. Dry time, that is.

I live at the northern tip of a large swath of coastal rain forest. I should be used to rain, mist, and overcast. I am used to it. But a little change up is what puts things in perspective. So if we had a couple of brilliantly sunny and warm days, it would make me long for the misty mornings or lovely sound of the rain on the roof.

What does this have to do with poetry? Well, in looking over my work, I’m trying to see if I stick with one predominant style. If everything sounds the same, then a collection of the work will be a little like a month of rain, or even a month of sun. Too much of anything is, well, too much. I think the same thing can happen with reading. I tend to pursue a type of poet that I enjoy and then I suddenly find myself longing for something completely different. After my Chase Twichell immersion, I picked up David Rivard’s Sugartown. Rivard’s work is filled with quirky references to pop culture, fractured line lengths, surrealistic high notes intermingled with tumbling physical detail. Very different than Twichell, but lovely. It’s like a glaring sunny day with a high wind warning. I’m enjoying it.

  • Share/Bookmark